HOLD IN CAMERA TRIALS -SEXUAL HARRASMENT
HOLD IN
CAMERA TRIALS IN ALL SEXUAL HARRASMENT CASES
CASE: XYZ Vs State of Madhya Pradesh
In 2013, JS Verma Committee which reformed the Rape Laws in
India after the Nirbhaya Rape Case mentioned about the In Camera Trial for
Women. WHY this in camera trial? Earlier women had to go through multiple trial
given her statements to police officer and courts again and again. So as per
Section 327 of the Code of criminal Procedure, in trial camera were only
allowed for Rape cases. During this woman had to go through the trauma,
societal shame and unwanted stigma. These where the reasons women were scared
of reporting and never tried approaching the police or the court. To remove
these barriers JS Verma Committee came up with in camera trials for Rape.
On 12th August 2022, bench comprising of Justice
D.Y. Chandrachud and Justice JB Pardiwala noted that legal proceedings tend to
be more onerous for complainants for sexual assault as they are dealing with
trauma and societal shame. The court
directed all lower courts to allow in camera in all cases relating to the
sexual harassment. The court has now
extended the Section 327 of Code of Criminal Procedure to all sexual harassment
on woman.
The bench ordered Four duties and responsibilities that need
to be followed by the trial court in an appropriate manner:
a) Allowing
proceeding to be conducted in camera, when appropriate, either under section
327 Code of Criminal Procedure or when the case otherwise involves the
aggrieved person testifying s to their experience of sexual
harassment/violence.
b) Installation
of a screen to ensure that the aggrieved woman does not have to see the accused
while testifying and immediately leave the remove after women’s testimony.
c) Ensuring
that the counsel for the accused conducts the cross-examination of the
aggrieved woman in a respectful manner regarding the sexual history. Before asking the cross-questions, the
counsel has to submit the questions to the court.
d) Completing
cross-examination in one sitting, as far as possible.
The court relied on the judgment in the case Aparna Bhat
Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh, in which it was noted that criminal procedure
was moulded in a manner to enable victims of sexual crimes to seek justice and
handle sexual crimes in appropriate sensitive manner. The bench also said it is important for all
the courts to remain cognizant of the fact that the legal process tends to be
more onerous for complaints who are potentially dealing with trauma and
societal shame due to the unwanted stigma attached to victims of sexual
harassment and assault. And if the police fails then it is the duty of the
court to take care.

Comments
Post a Comment