Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Section
138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Section 138 related to dishonour of cheque for
insufficiency, etc. of fund in the account.
Where any cheque drawn by
a person on an account maintained by him with a banker-
·
for payment of any amount of money
·
to another person from that account
·
Either because of the : -
Amount
of money standing to the credit of that account is insufficient to honour the cheque, or
That
it exceeds the amount arranged to be paid from that account by an agreement
made with that bank.
Punishment:-
Maximum imprisonment 2 year,
or
Maximum Fine Twice of Amount, or
Both.
Bail
amount in under section 138 of negotiable act, 1881
Law requires the accused to deposit 20% of cheque amount failing
which case will be heard and decided ex-party.
Provided
that this section shall not apply, unless-
Cheque
presented within the validity period:- The cheque has been
presented within the validity of period of three (3) months from the date of
issue of cheque or within the periods of its validity, whichever is earlier.
Demand
of payment through the notice:- The payee or HDC (holder
in due course) of the cheque, as the case may be, makes a demand for the
payment of the said amount of money by giving a notice, in writing, to the
drawer of the cheque, within 30 days of the receipt of information by him from
the bank regarding the return of the cheque as unpaid, and
Failure
of drawer to make payment:- The drawer of such cheque
fails to make the payment of the said amount of money to the payee or, as the
case may be, to the holder in due course of the cheque, within 15 days of the
receipt of the said notice.
Reasons
of dishonour a cheque
There are many reasons to
dishonour of cheque which is stated below:-
- Insufficient funds in the payer’s bank account
- Signature missing or mismatch
- Account number mismatch
- An issue with the date of the cheque
- Mismatch in the amount of words and numbers
- Disfigured or damaged cheque
- Crossing the limit of the overdraft
- Scribbling, overwriting or omissions on the
cheque without authorization(signature) of the payer
- Cheque is expired
- Drawer’s account is closed
- Payment is stopped by the drawer
- Garnishee order on account
- Death or insanity of the drawer
- The seal of the company is missing on the
cheque issued by an organization
- Suspicion of a forged cheque
Can we file a FIR for a cheque bounce?
Yes, we can file an FIR against the person who has issued a
cheque. A person can then file a case against the
issuer of the cheque under Section 420 or 406 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) in
a criminal court.
Section 420
related to cheating & dishonestly including delivery of property and Section 406 belongs to punishment of
criminal breach of trust.
Case Law
The case
of M/s. Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Ltd. v.
M/s.Galaxy Traders & Agencies Ltd. & Ors. is one of the cases whose judgment became a
landmark for the Supreme Court, in this case, reasoning behind the enactment of
Section 138 of the Negotiable and Instruments Act, 1881 was given. The facts of
the case revolve around dishonouring of the cheque because of which notice was
issued to inform the accused. When the same was received by the complainant by
that time the period of filing the complaint was given to expire. The same
thing happened for the second time as well with the accused failing to provide
with the amount.
The court
basing its judgement on the existing facts said that Section 138 of the Act has
been made keeping in concern any kind of infringement of legal right of the
person whose payment has not been issued and therefore if any such situation
arises which will make it impossible for the person to get the payment then in
such case, the section should function the way it has been laid down to keep
the objective of the Act. Thus, in this case, the court ordered actions to be
carried out against the respondent as laid down in the Act.
Legal Basta law firm actively supports in term of Free Legal assistance- and legal help to the victims of sexual abuse and always take legal stand for the legal rights of child and women…
Comments
Post a Comment